IMPORTANT (F2 review): the service promises to validate structural
coherence (sums, required leiaute fields) per design spec decision #3, but
the one sum that can genuinely diverge -- pagamento.valor vs the document
total -- was unchecked. The lib documents SEFAZ rejects this with 'Valor do
Pagamento difere do total' (sowai_fiscal.xml_builder).
Adds PagamentoTotalMismatchError, computed in the completeness block
(before allocate_fiscal_number) by reusing sowai_fiscal.xml_builder.
soma_itens_quantizados -- the SAME function the lib's own _build_total uses
for vNF/vProd, avoiding a second source of truth for the same total.
Decimal-exact comparison (never float), both sides quantized to cents the
same way _build_pag does. Router maps it to 409 pagamento_total_diverge.
Test: tests/emission/test_emissao.py::
test_pagamento_divergente_do_total_dos_itens_e_409_e_nao_queima_numero --
pagamento.valor != Σ itens -> 409 pagamento_total_diverge, no fiscal number
consumed. The existing golden-backed happy-path tests (already balanced)
continue to prove the matching-totals case still succeeds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
IMPORTANT (F2 review): certificate is per-tenant, matching series (already
tenant-scoped) and the GET/DELETE anti-oracle boundary. Emission's
_get_live_certificate and the upload-replace pre-check (certificates.
service, renamed _get_live_certificate_by_branch ->
_get_live_certificate_by_tenant_branch) both omitted tenant_ref -- two
tenants of one product reusing branch_ref="matriz" collapsed onto the same
slot: B's upload soft-deleted A's still-live certificate, and A's emission
went on to sign with B's certificate.
Migration 8f1a2c9d4b6e replaces the partial-unique index
ix_fiscal_certificates_product_branch_live with
ix_fiscal_certificates_product_tenant_branch_live on
(product_id, tenant_ref, branch_ref) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL, with a
working downgrade. Upload's two-layer defense (pre-check + IntegrityError ->
CertificateUploadConflictError) still holds against the new index.
Tests:
- tests/emission/test_emissao.py::
test_dois_tenants_do_mesmo_produto_reusando_branch_ref_tem_certificados_isolados
-- two tenants upload for the same product/branch_ref, both stay live;
emission for each signs with its OWN certificate (observable via FIX 1's
CNPJ check: without FIX 2, tenant A's emission would 409
emitente_certificate_cnpj_mismatch because the "live" cert would
actually be B's).
- tests/migrations/test_fiscal_documents_schema.py::
test_two_tenants_can_both_hold_a_live_certificate_for_the_same_branch_ref_on_real_migration
-- real alembic upgrade head, raw INSERTs proving both tenants' certs
land live.
- tests/migrations/test_fiscal_documents_schema.py::
test_two_live_certificates_for_same_product_tenant_branch_violate_unique_index_on_real_migration
(renamed from ..._product_branch_...) -- same (product, tenant, branch)
still rejects a second live certificate on the real migration.
- tests/certificates/test_certificates.py::
test_concurrent_uploads_for_same_product_branch_only_one_wins_the_other_gets_409
updated for the renamed/re-scoped precheck function (still same-tenant
race, still 1 winner + 1 CertificateUploadConflictError).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CRITICAL (F2 review, Opus+Fable): the service decoupled emitente
(free-form payload.emitente.cnpj) from the certificate (looked up by
branch_ref) with nothing re-checking the equality the auto had structurally
via Branch.cnpj. A caller passing emitente.cnpj=B with a branch whose
certificate CNPJ=A got a signed, persisted ASSINADO document with
chave/emit=B but signature=A, having burned a nNF.
Adds EmitenteCertificateCnpjMismatchError, checked in the completeness
block (before allocate_fiscal_number, so a mismatch never consumes a
número), normalizing both sides (digits only) before comparing. Router maps
it to 409 emitente_certificate_cnpj_mismatch; message never leaks the
certificate's CNPJ.
Test: tests/emission/test_emissao.py::
test_emitente_cnpj_divergente_do_certificado_e_409_e_nao_queima_numero --
uploads a cert for CNPJ A, POSTs emissão with the same branch_ref but
emitente.cnpj=B, asserts 409 + no fiscal number consumed (a follow-up
emission with the matching CNPJ gets the number that would have been
burned).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
