diff --git a/src/fiscal_svc/emission/schemas.py b/src/fiscal_svc/emission/schemas.py
index 03129aa..a50975c 100644
--- a/src/fiscal_svc/emission/schemas.py
+++ b/src/fiscal_svc/emission/schemas.py
@@ -1,9 +1,16 @@
 """Task 5: `EmissaoRequest` -- the pydantic mirror of `sowai_fiscal.
 xml_builder.DadosEmissao` (+ `sowai_fiscal.resolver.FiscalResult`/
 `TributoLinha`, which the lib itself already defines as pydantic
-`BaseModel`s -- these two are NOT re-mirrored here as separate payload
-classes, `emission.service` constructs them straight via `FiscalResult(**
-...)`/`TributoLinha(**...)`), adapted per the porte table and design spec:
+`BaseModel`s -- FIX 6, F2 review: these two ARE re-mirrored here, as
+`FiscalResultPayload`/`TributoLinhaPayload` below, kept SEPARATE from the
+lib's own classes on purpose -- this module is the wire contract this
+SERVICE owns (a field the lib adds/renames should never silently change
+what a caller across the network is allowed to send), while the lib's
+`FiscalResult`/`TributoLinha` are what `sowai_fiscal.xml_builder.build_nfe`
+actually consumes internally. `emission.service._to_fiscal_result`/
+`_to_tributo` convert Payload -> lib class (`FiscalResult(**payload.
+model_dump())`, not the payload objects themselves), adapted per the porte
+table and design spec:
 
   * `tenant_ref`/`branch_ref` (opaque strings, decision #4) replace what in
     the auto was implicit (`sale.branch_id`).